Skip to main content

Full text of "10PRAIA51"

See other formats


VZCZCXR05587 
RR  RUEHMA 

DE  RUEHPA  #0051/01  0342201 

ZNR  UUUUU  ZZH 

R 032201Z  FEB  10 

FM  AMEMBASSY  PRAIA 

TO  RUEHC/SECSTATE  WASHDC  1934 

INFO  RUEHC/DEPT  OF  LABOR  WASHINGTON  DC 

RUE HGV/USMIS SION  GENEVA  0016 

RUEHZK/ECOWAS  COLLECTIVE 

RUEHPA/ AMEMBASSY  PRAIA  2900 

UNCLAS  SECTION  01  OF  03  PRAIA  000051 

SENSITIVE 

SIPDIS 

DOL/ILAB  FOR  TINA  MCCARTER 
DOL/IL  FOR  TU  DANG 

E.O.  12958:  N/A 

TAGS:  ELAB  ETRD  PHUM  SOCI  CV 

SUBJECT:  CAPE  VERDE  REPORTS  NO  WORST  FORMS  OF  CHILD  LABOR 

REF:  STATE  131997 

PRAIA  00000051  001.2  OF  003 


IQ.  (SBU)  SUMMARY:  Cape  Verde  has  a very  low  incidence  of  forced 
and  exploitative  child  labor  has  no  worst  forms  of  child  labor. 
Of  children  who  work,  most  do  so  to  augment  their  family  income. 

Specifically,  many  of  these  children  work  as  street  vendors  and 
car  washers  in  cities,  or  assist  with  harvests  in  rural  areas. 
These  tasks  are  usually  done  outside  school  hours.  Forced  and 
exploitative  child  labor  is  believed  to  be  rare,  however  the 
tracking  and  enforcement  mechanisms  of  the  Cape  Verdean 
government  employs  in  the  area  are  relatively  weak  and  could  be 
strengthened.  End  summary. 


J2 . (U)  The  following  answers  are  keyed  to  reftel  questions. 


Tasking  1/TVPRA:  Use  of  Forced  Labor  and/or  Exploitive  Child 
Labor  in  the  Production  of  Goods 


Cape  Verde  does  not  use  forced  labor  and  exploitative  child 
labor  in  the  production  of  goods. 


Tasking  2/TDA:  Exploitive  Child  Labor  for  Countries  Eligible  for 
Trade  Benefits  under  the  Generalized  System  of  Preferences  (GSP) 


2A)  PREVALENCE  AND  SECTORAL  DISTRIBUTION  OF  EXPLOITIVE  CHILD 
LABOR : 

IQ.  Children  were  involved  in  domestic  service,  street  vending, 
and  car  washing.  Children  help  their  parents  earn  a living, 
especially  in  single-parent  and  low  income  families. 

%2 . The  government  is  willing  to  provide  the  data  set  to  DOL  for 
further  analysis. 


2 B)  LAWS  AND  REGULATIONS: 


1.1 .  No  new  laws  or  regulations  were  enacted  in  regard  to 
exploitive  child  labor.  Children  continued  to  work  as  street 
vendors  and  car  washers  but  mostly  as  a means  to  help  their 
families . 

2 C)  INSTITUTIONS  AND  MECHANISMS  FOR  ENFORCEMENT  OF  HAZARDOUS 
CHILD  LABOR  AND  FORCED  CHILD  LABOR:  (Note:  the  answers  for  Qh 

sections  are  the  same.  End  note.) 

1.1.  The  agencies  responsible  for  the  enforcement  of  laws  relating 
to  hazardous  child  labor  and  forced  child  labor  were  the 
Ministry  of  Labor,  Professional  Training  and  Social  Solidarity, 
the  Direction-General  of  Labor,  and  the  Inspection  General  of 
Labor . 

12.  The  agencies  may  exchange  information  through  written  reports 
and  "ad  hoc"  information.  There  have  been  no  reports  of 
hazardous  child  labor. 

13.  Complaints  may  be  filed  through  written  or  oral  reports. 

There  were  no  complaints  received  in  the  reporting  period. 

14.  There  was  no  funding  provided  specifically  to  agencies 
responsible  for  inspections.  Inspectors  have  sufficient  office 
facilities,  but  lack  transportation,  fuel,  and  financial  means 
to  reach  all  points  of  the  country  and  train  people  to  carry  out 
inspections . 

15.  There  are  no  inspectors  specifically  to  address  hazardous 
child  and  forced  child  labor  issues. 

1.6.  No  inspections  involving  child  labor  were  carried  out,  since 
there  were  no  reported  hazardous  child  labor  cases.  Children  do 
not  work  in  formal  sectors  which  are  regularly  inspected,  but 
mainly  on  the  streets  as  car  washers  and  street  vendors. 
Inspectors  have  reported  no  cases  of  hazardous  child  labor  and 
received  no  complaints  of  hazardous  child  labor. 

PRAIA  00000051  002.2  OF  003 


2C,  Sections  I and  II,  Questions  7 through  13:  Hazardous  child 

labor  and  forced  child  labor 

N/A 

1.14.  The  government  did  not  offer  any  training  for  investigators 
or  others  responsible  for  enforcement. 

2D)  INSTITUTIONAL  MECHANISMS  FOR  EFFECTIVE  ENFORCEMENT  OF  CHILD 
TRAFFICKING,  COMMERCIAL  SEXUAL  EXPLOITATION  (CSE)  OF  CHILDREN, 

USE  OF  CHILDREN  IN  ILLICIT  ACTIVITIES:  (Note:  the  answers  are 

the  same  for  all  three  areas.  End  note.) 

1.1.  The  country  did  not  have  agencies  or  personnel  dedicated  to 
enforcement  of  child  trafficking  of  children  in  illicit 
activities.  The  government  employed  no  investigators/social 
workers/dedicated  police  officers  to  conduct  investigations. 

1.2.  No  funding  was  provided  to  agencies  responsible  for 
investigating  child  trafficking  of  children  in  illicit 
activities . 

1.3.  The  country  maintained  a victims'  hotline  for  reporting  child 
trafficking,  CSE  and  in  illicit  activities  violations.  No 
complaints  were  received. 

14.  No  investigations  were  opened  since  there  were  no  child 
traf f icking/CSE/use  of  children  in  illicit  activities  cases. 

Questions  5 through  11:N/A 

1.12.  No,  the  government  offered  no  training  for  investigators  or 
others  responsible  for  enforcement  of  child  trafficking. 

113.  N/A 


2E ) GOVERNMENT  POLICIES  ON  CHILD  LABOR: 


IQ.  No,  this  is  not  viewed  as  a significant  issue,  so  the 
government  did  not  have  a policy  or  plan  that  specifically 
addressed  exploitive  child  labor. 

12 .  The  country  did  not  incorporate  exploitive  child  labor 
specifically  as  an  issue  to  be  addressed  in  poverty  reduction, 
development,  educational  or  other  social  policies.  However,  all 
programs  that  fight  poverty  contribute  indirectly  to  enabling 
children  to  leave  work  and  enter  school.  For  example,  the 
Institute  of  Children  and  Adolescents  (ICCA)  has  shelter  for 
homeless  and/or  abandoned  children  to  prevent  them  from  staying 
on  the  streets,  thus  decreasing  child  labor.  Another  important 
public  policy  element  is  that  primary  education  is  compulsory 
and  free  nationwide. 


13.  The  government  did  not  provide  funding  specifically  for  child 
labor . 

14.  N/A 

15.  The  Association  for  the  Children  in  Need  (ACRIDES)  has  a 
program  in  partnership  with  public  and  private  entities,  under 
which  hot  meals  are  provided  to  street  kids,  and  has  a shelter 
that  provides  after-school  education  programs.  ACRIDES  also  has 
a program  focused  on  children  in  conflict  with  the  law  that 
brings  them  out  of  the  unofficial  work-force. 

16.  No  information  available. 

17.  No,  the  government  did  not  sign  bilateral,  regional  or 
international  agreement  to  combat  trafficking. 

2F ) SOCIAL  PROGRAMS  TO  ELIMINATE  OR  PREVENT  CHILD  LABOR: 

11.  As  child  labor  is  not  viewed  as  a significant  issue,  the 
government  did  not  implement  any  programs  specifically  to 
address  the  worst  forms  of  child  labor. 

12.  The  country  did  not  incorporate  child  labor  specifically  as 
an  issue  to  be  addressed  in  poverty  reduction,  development, 
educational  or  other  social  programs,  such  as  conditional  cash 
transfer  programs  or  eligibility  for  school  meals,  etc. 

13.  N/A 

14 . The  government  did  not  provide  any  non-monetary  support  to 
child  labor  programs,  as  child  labor  is  not  viewed  as  a 

PRAIA  00000051  003.2  OF  003 


significant  issue  in  the  country. 

15.  N/A 

16.  N/A 

2G ) CONTINUAL  PROGRESS: 


11.  There  are  no  official  statistics  available  for  2009,  yet. 
However,  during  the  reporting  period,  the  government  of  Cape 
Verde  found  that  no  worst  forms  of  child  labor  existed; 
therefore  the  government  has  developed  no  specific  policy  or 
program  to  combat  exploitive  child  labor.  However,  through  ICCA 
and  with  the  support  of  NGOs  such  as  ACRIDES,  it  indirectly 
contributed  to  preventing  exploitative  child  labor  situations. 
Following  the  2006  Community  of  Portuguese  Speaking  Countries 
(CPLP)  meeting  in  Lisbon,  where  it  was  agreed  that  Cape  Verde 
would  join  other  member  states  in  an  attempt  to  combat  child 
labor,  the  government  agreed  to  follow  the  recommendations  of 
the  CPLP.  ICCA  carried  out  a study  on  the  worst  forms  of  child 
labor  at  the  government's  request,  which  was  broadcast  on  the 
government-owned  TV  station  and  given  media  coverage.  During 
the  year,  ICCA  reported  that  there  were  no  worst  forms  of  child 


labor,  as  defined  by  the  ILO  182  Convention. 
MYLES